Editorial Guidelines

Last updated: {{september}} {{2025}}

Our mission is simple: help you choose antivirus, VPN, and identity-protection tools without hype. Here’s how we keep coverage clear, fair, and useful.

Independence & funding

  • Some links are affiliate links; if you buy, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
  • Commissions do not influence inclusion, rankings, or verdicts. See our full Affiliate Disclosure.

How we choose what to cover

  • Relevance to readers (features, value, availability, reputation).
  • Clear use cases (families, remote workers, travelers, privacy-first users).
  • We include multiple reputable options; no “pay-to-play.”

How we verify information

  • Primary sources: official plan/feature pages, support docs, in-app screens, and trial flows when feasible.
  • Hands-on checks (where possible): setup, key toggles (e.g., firewall/kill switch), and basic behavior (e.g., DNS/WebRTC leak checks).
  • Independent signals: lab results and third-party audits are referenced when relevant (and labeled as such).
  • Regional/plan variance: when features vary by country/tier, we call it out.

Comparisons & verdicts

  • Our tables surface must-knows side-by-side (features, trials/refunds, limitations).
  • Pros/Cons highlight trade-offs—no product is “best for everyone.”
  • If we name “Top Picks,” we say why (use case + constraints).

Updates & freshness

  • We refresh key pages regularly and after major vendor changes.
  • Each page shows “Last updated”; material revisions get a note in “What changed.”

Conflicts of interest

  • We do not accept payments for positive coverage.
  • Sponsored content, if any, is clearly labeled “Sponsored.”
  • Reviewers disclose material relationships or access (e.g., demo licenses).

Corrections

See our Corrections & Updates Policy for how to report an issue and how we fix it.

Contact

Questions about these guidelines? Email [email protected]